I had to step out of a ‘debate’ over gun control today.  I have gotten better at doing this.  I still cannot handle irrational and intellectually dishonest people, but at least I have learned to step away from them.  However, I learned something very important thanks to this ‘debate.’  Maybe ‘learned’ is not the best word, as I have known about and its connection to helping tyrants rise to power for a while.  What made this discussion different is how clearly I saw the problem, and how well I understood how and why it works.  This time, I came face-to-face with the primary factor needed to establish tyranny. Continue reading “AGENDAS: The Primary Factor Needed to Establishing Tyranny” →

This may be a short post, but I hope you will understand the magnitude and scope of what it means for America (and the Western world in general).  You may not have heard, or even care, but the media is going after the New England Patriots football team over alleged rules violations concerning the air pressure in the balls they used in last week’s game.  There have been calls for their coach to be fired and even jailed.  In one interview, a reporter openly questioned the coach’s character to his face.  All of this concern is over something as trivial as an accusation that a team broke a rule in a football game.  Yet, these same media people who want to throw someone in jail for breaking a rule — not a law, a rule — these same people don’t give a second thought to the President of the United States not only breaking the law, but publicly boasting about it.  Now, ask yourself, what sort of society can continue when it does not care about its leaders breaking the supreme law of the land, but makes a national crisis out of an allegation over a rule in a game?  Or more importantly, what does it say about us, as individuals?  Continue reading “A Sure Sign of Social Decay” →

Progressives (American Liberals), Fascists, Communists, Marxists  and Socialists all stress the State over the individual.  So, for the sake of discussion, I will refer to these groups as Statists.  Islam also stresses the collective over the individual.  If I remember correctly, the Islamic term for the collective is Umma.  Now, you may have already noticed that Statists and Islam both stress the collective over the individual, but this is a given.  I assume everyone who is paying attention already understands this.  No, I want to call your attention to another similarity between these groups, and it is a similarity that — if any one of these groups succeeds — must end in tyranny for the entire human race. Continue reading “AGENDAS: What do Socialists/Fascists/Progressives have in Common with Islam?” →

Our President can’t seem to call what happened in France today a terrorist attack.  Well, this may come as a surprise to some, but I agree with him.  It was not a terrorist attack, and neither was the Fort Hood shooting or even the 9/11 attack.  They are all acts of war — a holy war!  This is not my ‘opinion:’ it is a matter of fact.  I know it is a fact because I know what Muhammad said to his followers.  Muhammad started and defined Islam, so he is the ultimate — and in this case — soul authority on Islam and Muhammad commanded holy war until there is nothing left but Islam.  By definition, that means we have been in a state of holy war with Islam since before Muhammad died.  Unless we wake to this fact and start treating it as what it is, we will loose this war.  Unfortunately, too many people would rather accept the lies they are told by our leaders, media and Muslims.  So, I have taken the time to put together everything a rational person needs to decide whether or not I am telling the truth, and it all comes directly from Muhammad or ‘official’ Islamic holy texts. Continue reading “AGENDAS: We are NOT Fighting Terrorism, but a Holy War!” →

The Republican vote to return Boehner as Speaker of the House yesterday reminded me of a question a friend of mine asked me.  She wanted to know what sources I trust to get my news.  On the surface, these two things might not seem related, but they are.  And it is in how they are related that I finally figured out how to answer her.  So, for L, and anyone else who might be interested in how we can determine who and what to trust when we live in a world of deception, here are my thoughts.  I hope they help. Continue reading “How to Decide Who to Trust in a World of Deception” →

On this, the day we celebrate The Savior’s birth, I thought I might try to answer one of the most often cited objections to the Judeo/Christian faith: that there is only one way to God.  I do not claim that I can ‘prove’ any of what follows, nor am I trying to imply that we can reason our way to accept any of it.  We are saved by faith and faith alone, and only faith can affirm the Truth of what I am about to say.  However, that having been said, there are rational reasons for why there should be only one way to come into God’s presence, and why that One Way is Jesus, Christ.  If you will give me a few moments of your time, I might be able to help you see things from a different perspective and — if the Holy Spirit wills it — it may even help you see the Truth. Continue reading “TRUTH: Why Christ is the ONLY Way to God” →

[NOTE: this one is long, but it is also important and complicated, so I took the time to make my case as best I could.  If you stay with it, I believe it may help you see the issues a bit more clearly.  If not…  Well, in that case, you either don’t care, or you are part of the problem — as I once was (and may still be)]

I am just going to assume that the majority of us can agree that racism is wrong, but I wonder whether or not we can agree that there are two types of racism, and that government should only be involved in one of them?  I got these two types of racism from a respected friend.  They are ‘institutional’ racism, where prejudice and discrimination based on race are built into a society’s laws; and ‘personal’ racism, where that same prejudice and discrimination based on race is a part of a persona’s character.  There is a proper role for government in the first type of racism (‘institutional‘), but there is absolutely no role for government or force in the second.  This is because the second type of racism (‘personal‘) is a heart issue, and any time people start using government to force a change of heart, we have crossed the line of playing God.  Then, to make this situation even more confusing, we need to understand that things we sometimes think are the result of racism are actually due to another form of bigotry that has nothing to do with race at all: cultural bigotry.  We get confused over the difference here because we equate race with culture, but they are not the same and I hope you’ll let me tell you a little story to illustrate the difference. Continue reading “DEFENDING THE LANGUAGE: Racism vs. Bigotry vs. Culture” →

Are you Pro TEA Party or Pro Tyranny, Slavery/Indentured Servitude, Lawlessness and Licentiousness?  Yes, I understand that it is fallacious to argue “You’re either for me or against me”  — except when there are only two sides to an issue.  You can either be for liberty or control; for the law or lawlessness; for slavery or servitude; for morality of licentiousness.  You cannot be ‘neutral’ on these issues.  There is no “I support the law and lawlessness at the same time.”  By definition, such a position is lawlessness — especially when we are discussing Natural Law (as we are now).  So, when it comes to the TEA Party agenda, which are you: for them, or for Tyranny, Slavery, Lawlessness and Licentiousness?  Think I am wrong?  Then read this post and then tell me if you still think I’m wrong. Continue reading “LESSONS IN LOGIC: You are either Pro TEA Party, or You are Pro Tyranny (there’s no ‘middle ground’ on this issue)” →

Like my post on ‘Tolerance vs. Acceptance,’ this is another post where it is necessary to read carefully and think through the point(s) I am trying to make because, as in the other post, we are dealing with a force that is actively trying to change society by manipulating language.  The concept is easy: if you can control the language, you can control what and how people think.  Do not doubt that this is the thinking behind the confusion in our language today.  I can show you the people who said that this is exactly what they wanted to do and how they intended to do it: to direct human evolution by manipulating the language.  And those people are the founders of what we now call the Liberal/Progressive movement.  They are largely responsible for many of today believing that ‘justice’ and ‘fairness’ are the same thing.  They are not, and we need to understand the difference between the two concepts these words represent. Continue reading “DEFENDING THE LANGUAGE: Justice vs. Fairness” →

NOTE: Let me start with a confession: I am about the last person who should be writing this post.  That said, and while I still have a long way to go, I have recently learned to spot and admit to my own hypocrisy.  So please, understand that I write from the position of a guilty man.

Once again, I am writing in response to my favorite talk radio host (I’ll call him GB for short).  I honestly love this man.  Had it not been for him, this nation would still be ignorant of the political forces that are trying to destroy it from within, and I would have never learned to see my own failings.  I have nothing but respect for him in this regard.  However, I have something against him, and it is based in his own words. Continue reading “AGENDAS: How to Turn Hypocrisy into Millions of $’s and Adoring Fans” →

NOTE: This is one of the most important yet difficult posts in this series.  I implore you, please, read it carefully as the distinction I am going to try to explain is at the heart of many of our society’s problems.

Tolerance is defined as ‘acceptance,’ but this is  a perversion of the original meaning of tolerance.  Tolerance is not the same as acceptance, but I fear that the majority of people in our society do not understand the difference.  In fact, if all we look at is the modern dictionary, then we would most likely determine that I am wrong.  Fortunately, we have more than the modern dictionary to show us how our PC culture has changed our language. Continue reading “DEFENDING THE LANGUAGE: Tolerance vs Acceptance” →

It is common place to hear people talk about loving each other.  The majority of them seem to think that this is the answer to the majority of our problems, and I would tend to agree with them.  After all, as a Christian, I am commanded to love my neighbor — and my enemy!  But this is where I believe most people in our society miss the point.  They do not understand what the Bible means when it tells us to love each other as ourselves because they do not know about or understand the different types of love mentioned in the bible. Continue reading “DO YOU KNOW SCRIPTURE: The Many Types of Love in Scripture” →

I have no idea how to explain the mood I am in to you.  I am writing to warn you against someone many of us know and trust and who you may have even come to love.  I love him, but I cannot trust him — not anymore.  He has been saying things that have deeply trouble my Spirit.  I know what he is teaching people is wrong, but I have been wrestling with how to warn you about this man without sounding like I am attacking him.  I thought about not writing this at all.  I know that I am an imperfect messenger and that I could do more harm than good.  But I have also felt the weight of the Lord’s hand pressing on me today and I know that He will not give me rest until I write this post.  So it is with the confidence of knowing that I am not the author but merely the instrument by which this message is being written that I bring this warning to you: “Beware that your hearts are not deceived, and that you do not turn away and serve other gods and worship them.” (Deut 11:16).  It was Christ, Himself, Who warned us that there will be ravenous wolves who will enter the flock seeking to destroy it, and that they will come dressed in sheep’s clothing and bearing messages of peace [and I would add love].   Now I am asked to warn you that the people who are most effective at deceiving us are often the people whom we hold in highest regard. Continue reading “What do We do when We Know someone we Love, Trust and Respect is Deceiving Us?” →

I want to ask you to think back over the past few years.  Try to remember how many times you have seen organized violence employed on a massive scale.  I am going to ask you to reject the media’s claim that it has been ‘spontaneous.’  It hasn’t.  It is well known that it was all planned: from Occupy Wall Street to the Arab Spring.  All of it was ‘organized’ by violent revolutionaries, and the violence is used as part of their formula for toppling governments.  This is because the model works.  It was how Russia fell to Lenin, and how Hitler tried to take over Germany — the first time.  The idea is, if you can create enough hatred within society, then cause it to just break out into social unrest, then others will ‘stand up’ and the existing government can be brought down.  This is when the revolutionary believes he can step in and ‘direct’ the ‘rebuilding’ of the nation he envisions.  Unfortunately, history shows is never really works out the way the people think it will.  The reason this is important is because it is being used against us in America — again! Yes, I said again! Continue reading “AGENDAS: The Role of Violence in the Revolutionary’s Plan” →

It would appear that the Gruber story is no longer a concern for anyone.  Well, I haven’t forgotten it.  In fact, I’m going to add it to my list of things for which I am thankful this week.  I have tried to explain to whoever would listen that these people have been open and honest about what they believe, what they want to do and how they plan to do it.  I’ve even told people where to go to find their declarations.  But they usually declare their intentions in academic settings and in technical writings that are not easily accessed by the average person — until now.  Gruber changed all of this.  I simply cannot think of another example where everything I have tried to explain the past few years is so clearly illustrated, and yet, many people — even many who should know better — still do not see it.  So, at the risk of sounding arrogant, allow me to walk us through everything Gruber has told us this month. Continue reading “CONNECTING THE DOTS: How the Gruber Story Pulls Back the Curtain, Part II: Affirming the Warnings” →

U.S. Constitution

Article. I. (Legislative Branch)

Section. 1.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

. . .

Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To . . .

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, . . . ; — And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Continue reading “U.S. Constitution; “separation of powers” and remedy for purposeful violation” →

The Gruber story is more important than anyone I listen to seems to realize.  It literally pulls back the curtain to the ‘big picture’ I have been trying to help people see and understand.  Not even Beck seems to understand just how revealing this story actually is.  I suspect this is because the Gruber story is too big for most people to see it in its entirety — and I include myself in this.  I do not believe I can see everything that has been revealed here, but I do believe I see more than most.  That is because it is so big and so few of us today study enough disciplines to make the necessary connections.  We have become a society of specialists, and we are all very good in our fields.  But, if we are going to hope to see what is going on here, we have to be more like our founders: we have to be Renaissance men and women.   Sadly, there is no time left for the majority of us to get up to speed.  So, if you will allow me to do so, over the next few posts, I will: 1) Paint the ‘big picture’ as I understand it; 2) explain who the players are and where you can find them saying this is what they want to do; 3) show you how the Gruber story affirms that what is happening is the enactment of long-term plans to destroy America and 4) I will show you that the Republican Party is an active participant in these plans to destroy America. Continue reading “CONNECTING THE DOTS: How the Gruber Story Pulls Back the Curtain, Part I: the ‘Big Picture’” →

If you do not believe in conspiracy theories, I urge you to read this post.  If you reject everything that people like Beck and I have been trying to explain these past several years, then you need to read this post.  If you do not see the connections in the things that are happening in the world today, then it is imperative that you read this post!  If any of these things describe you or your position, you need to read this post because I am about to show you how just one story ties together all my years of blogging.  But please, you must understand, this is not an ‘I-told-you-so’ post, and it is not an ‘in-your-face’ post.  This is a sincere, heart-felt plea to get you to see and understand what these people think of you, and what they have felt entitled to do to you because of how they see you. Continue reading “CONNECTING THE DOTS: Obamacare Architect Story Reveals so much more than Arrogance” →

I have written about this many times: the people who want to control the world are open about what they believe and why.  You just have to know what they believe and how they speak.  Once you know these two things, you will notice that they are always talking about their plans for the rest of us.  It’s just that the majority of us are not inclined to evil, so we have a difficult time connecting their words to the horrors they are considering.  Global overpopulation is one of the major themes with these people, and it is in the new again.  This time, it is not George H. Bush, or Bill Gates talking about the need to reduce global population, it is the new ‘Ebola Czar:’

Continue reading “AGENDAS: ‘Population Control’ in the News — Again” →