AGENDAS: The Role of Violence in the Revolutionary’s Plan

I want to ask you to think back over the past few years.  Try to remember how many times you have seen organized violence employed on a massive scale.  I am going to ask you to reject the media’s claim that it has been ‘spontaneous.’  It hasn’t.  It is well known that it was all planned: from Occupy Wall Street to the Arab Spring.  All of it was ‘organized’ by violent revolutionaries, and the violence is used as part of their formula for toppling governments.  This is because the model works.  It was how Russia fell to Lenin, and how Hitler tried to take over Germany — the first time.  The idea is, if you can create enough hatred within society, then cause it to just break out into social unrest, then others will ‘stand up’ and the existing government can be brought down.  This is when the revolutionary believes he can step in and ‘direct’ the ‘rebuilding’ of the nation he envisions.  Unfortunately, history shows is never really works out the way the people think it will.  The reason this is important is because it is being used against us in America — again! Yes, I said again!

The Communist is — at heart — a violent revolutionary.  He has little patience.  He wants change now!  This works in places where the people are largely ignorant and have grown used to a system of violence and corruption.  It is why it worked in the Arab countries the past few years, and why it has worked in places like Central America.  However, when it was first tried in America (around the turn of the 20th Century), it didn’t work.  Americans were too law-abiding and still too ‘good’ in their basic nature to allow such a lawless process to succeed.  This is how and why the ‘Progressive’ movement was born (as Wilson envisioned it, not sop much as Teddy Roosevelt did).

The Wilson Progressive was a Communist at heart who was willing to play ‘the long game.’  Rather than try the route of violent revolution, Wilson advocated a slower, step-at-a-time method whereby the society was ‘transformed’ from within until it either became socialist, or the conditions were created to allow the violent method to work.  That is what happened in the 1960’s: the Communists tried to topple America from within by inciting massive civil unrest across America.  Fortunately, Americans were still too well educated and too attached to the rule of law to give in to the violence.

But this is a different time.  Now the media tells the people that the police cannot be trusted.  We are told this is still a racist nation and injustice cannot be had for minorities or the ‘poor.’  We trumpet violence in the name of ‘justice,’ even when the facts show that a supposed ‘victim’ was actually the aggressor and the ‘accused’ was just defending themselves.  It has gone so far that no one even blinks when the President of the United States openly violates the Constitution and then boasts about doing it.  Or worse, the leader of the House then says Congress will not impeach the President for breaking the law.  In short, we have become a nation that embraces lawlessness.  This means that, after decades of social engineering, the people who want to ‘fundamentally transform’ America think they have finally achieved the conditions they need to affect their revolution in America.

Once again, if you know the players and where to look, you will find that they are clear about this.  The violent revolutionaries are still with us, only now, they are inside the Obama Administration.  Remember Bill Ayres said he wishes he had done more killing to incite revolution.  This is the same Bill Ayres who has been connected to Obama and Obama’s family since his time in Chicago.  Obama is also connected to Francis Fox Piven, who helped devise the Cloward and Piven strategy for toppling America.  She believes in the use of violence to achieve her goals.  Watch this video and pay close attention to how carefully she frames her words, but pay closer attention to her facial expressions and body language.

Notice that she didn’t say to actually be peaceful: she said ‘espouse’ peace as a means of protection.  This is what Scripture warns us about: people who destroy in the name of peace.  They claim to be for peace, but they agitate, disrupt and destroy.  They are not Gandhi; they are Alinsky.  Alinsky adovcated violence to achieve political goals.  Obama was a student of Alinksy, as was Hillary Clinton.  Obama taught Alinksy — not the U.S. Constitution.  We have members of the ‘media’ who have said Alinksy was their hero in the 1960’s.  This means a ‘community organizer’ is nothing more than a ‘pleasant’ word for violent revolutionary.  But this shouldn’t surprise you, and if you have read Rules for Radicals, then it doesn’t — because you know Alinksy specifically said to use innocent sounding words and terms to hide the true nature of your goals.

This is what Occupy Wall Street was all about: trying to incite the massive violence necessary to achieve revolution.  It is what the Ferguson riots are all about (they were planned, and Obama was a part of the planning — it is on tape!).  It’s just that the leaders never do anything that can be clearly shown as an incitement to violence.  They know it is what they are doing, but they do it with ‘plausible deniability.’  However, once you know the players, and you start reading their work and listening to their speeches, you quickly understand they know exactly what they are doing.  They are trying to create enough unrest to justify a declaration of ’emergency.’  Once they can justify that declaration, we lose our nation as they will suspend the Constitution — just as Hitler did in the 1930’s.

Please don’t doubt me here.  These people study revolution, not governance.  It is why they are so good at causing trouble and so bad at actually governing.  This is why so many of us think they are incompetent: because we think they ran for office so they could govern.  They didn’t!  They ran for office so they could seize control of the institutions necessary to create the environment for violent revolution, then cause the unrest necessary to initiate it.  That’s what these people study: destruction.  They destroy in the name of peace and compassion, but make no mistake — they destroy all the same.  Just have a look at Ferguson and you have all the evidence you need.  Any President who truly wanted to do good would have taken this opportunity to sound like MLK or Lincoln, not Hitler or Wilson.  Obama could have spoken true peace and used Ferguson to bring us together, but he chose to stoke the fires and fame the flames.  Again, make no mistake: Obama knew what he was doing.  All of these people know exactly what they are doing:

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happened, you can bet it was planned that way.”

–Franklin D. Roosevelt