WARNING!
This post is intended for the education of those who seek the Truth — no matter what that Truth may be. It is wholly unsuited for those who seek to believe in lies.
There are many voices in our government and media telling us that Islam is peaceful and has nothing to do with violence or terrorism. Well, rather than take their word for it, or the word of anyone else — including me — why not look to see what Muhammad actually said about Islam’s connection to terrorism? Here are justa few of the things Muhammad had to say on the matter:
note: passages in red are from the Qur’an; those in black are from the Sunnah (customs and sayings of Muhammad), the second holiest book in Islam and absolutely necessary to make a religion out of the Qur’an.
Bukhari:V4B52N220
“Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.'”
Qur’an:8:12
“I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”
Qur’an:8:57
“If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”
Qur’an:8:67
“It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughter in the land.”
Ishaq:327
“Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.'”
Qur’an:33:26
“Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.”
Qur’an:33:60
“Truly, if the Hypocrites [those who only pretend to be Muslims but do not obey Muhammad’s commands] stir up sedition, if the agitators in the City do not desist, We shall urge you to go against them and set you over them. Then they will not be able to stay as your neighbors for any length of time. They shall have a curse on them. Whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain without mercy – a fierce slaughter – murdered, a horrible murdering.”
Tabari VII:20; Ishaq:288
“The Quraysh said, ‘Muhammad and his Companions have violated the sacred month, shed blood, seized property, and taken men captive.’ The polytheists spread lying slander concerning him, saying, ‘Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill our people.'”
Ishaq:288
“When the Qur’an:passage concerning this matter was revealed, and Allah relieved Muslims from their fear and anxiety, Muhammad took possession of the caravan and prisoners. The Quraysh sent him a ransom and the Prophet released the prisoners on payment. When the Qur’an:authorization came down to Muhammad, Abd Allah and his Companions were relieved and they became anxious for an additional reward. They said, ‘Will this raid be counted as part of the reward promised to Muslim combatants?’ So Allah sent down this Qur’an: ‘Those who believe and have fought in Allah’s Cause may receive Allah’s mercy.’ Allah made the booty permissible. He divided the loot, awarding four-fifths to the men He had allowed to take it. He gave one-fifth to His Apostle.”
Ishaq:315
“It was so criminal, men could hardly imagine it. Muhammad was ennobled because of the bloody fighting. I swear we shall never lack soldiers, nor army leaders. Driving before us infidels until we subdue them with a halter above their noses and a branding iron. We will drive them to the ends of the earth. We will pursue them on horse and on foot. We will never deviate from fighting in our cause. We will bring upon the infidels the fate of the Ad and Jurhum. Any people that disobey Muhammad will pay for it. If you do not surrender to Islam, then you will live to regret it. You will be shamed in Hell, forced to wear a garment of molten pitch forever!”
Ishaq:395
“Muslims, if you listen to the unbelievers you will retreat from the enemy and become losers. Ask Allah for victory and do not retreat, withdrawing from His religion. ‘We will terrorize those who disbelieve. In that way I will help you against them.'”
I could post pages of such commands from the Qur’an and records of Muhammad’s example to prove that Muhammad actually boasted that he was successful in spreading Islam through the use of terror, but if these passages are not enough, then pages more won’t be either. Truth seekers will already be convinced by now, and those who aren’t… Well, they never will be because the Truth is not in them — only darkness.
Glenn Beck is correct about this issue: those who insist that Muhammad and Islam have nothing to do with terrorism are making a Monty Python skit of the most dangerous foe the West and even the world has ever faced!
In case you actually want to read more of those citations I mentioned, you can find them here.
HELP SPREAD THE WORD
Everyone who finds this humble little place on the Internet does so because they heard about it from others. I do not advertise this blog page. So, please, if you find it useful, please share it with your friends.
The Oil for Your Lamp 
Reblogged this on The Rio Norte Line and commented:
With all the different voices out there telling us about Islam, what it believes and what it teaches, how can we know which to trust and believe? Well, if you want to know what Christ taught, you would go to the four Gospels in the New Testament, so why not go to Muhammad to find out what Muhammad actually taught? If you want to know what MUHAMMAD ***really*** said about the connection between Islam and terrorism, give this a read:
Reblogged this on Dak's Bays.
Reblogged this on UZA – people's courts, forums, & tribunals and commented:
OYL, well researched; however, what you failed to report is exactly who the Infidel is;
The Infidel they are referring to, is all the religions that worship a “god” with companions; Islam recognizes that the God of Abraham is the God of the Jews, Christians and Islam; There are numerous Christian and Jewish groups who only worship the One God and fall in this category; and, there are many pagan Christians such as the Catholics and all the occult priests of the MITRE of Dagon, son of Baal;
Here in Southern Africa, our radical Islamists are rooting out drugs from their communities; we are all equal people here and we all peacefully engage in finding remedy, together; there is no us or them, only us;
What the Christians and Jews in the Northern hemisphere need to realize that Islam is here to stay; everyone is being used by the shadow elite to create division; the true jihadists are lashing out at your governments and unfortunately innocent people are getting in harms way; a good warrior will turn an invasion into his favour; example, put up a sign declaring peace with Islam and leave the names and addresses of the CEO Banksters, instead; get creative; outsmart the “enemy” without violence; that is true power;
Consider that IT IS A LAW OF LIFE that problems arise when conditions are there for their solution.
Focus on the remedy, and not the hows and whys; and remember: “Thou shalt not kill.” When two forces are the same in their dogmatic beliefs then there will be conflict;
We Southern Africans are a revolution ahead of most countries; we had victory, but we were sold down the river and there was no Islamics involved he he; and, though we may seem down now, we needed this 21 years to realize the truth; our next revolution in 2016 will be more peaceful and more lasting; now we know what we don’t want; our xenophobia is way, way less than in the Northern hemisphere; we see a big, sad clash coming between the Crusaders and Islam in the North because both sides are so arrogant and believe the other has no place; they are no different to each other and there is nothing we can say to make them change their destiny; they are going to nuke each other while we in the Southern Hemisphere will lay the wreaths and pray for the innocent souls; this will cause our people to quickly come to terms and make peace with each other so that this calamity does not befall us; the time of sorrows is truly upon us; in peace
OK, there is a lot to address here, so please bear with me.
First, Islam CLAIMS that they worship the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, BUT THEY DO NOT!
https://theoyl.com/understanding-islam/misconceptions/allah-is-not-the-god-of-abraham-isaac-and-jacob/
Next, Muhammad commanded Muslims to wage war against EVERYONE who refuses to convert to Islam — EVERYONE! Specifically, Muhammad targets Jews and Christians. Islam rejects the Trinity. The problem is, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob describes Himself in terms of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. So, when Islam rejects the Trinity, it rejects the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Next, there is no “peace” with Islam unless you submit to Allah (i.e. become a Muslim — and even then, you must submit to EVERYTHING Muhammad commanded or be declared a hypocrite).
As for ignoring the cause and focusing on the remedy: THAT DOES NOT WORK! Think of it this way: you have a bacterial infection and it gives you a dangerously high fever. If I take your advise, I will just dunk you in cold water (the remedy) and ignore the infection. How well does that work? In many cases, it will still lead to death — BECAUSE WE IGNORED THE CAUSE! In this case, the cause of Islamic violence is Islam, as Muhammad defined it — period!
Also, this is NOT “xenophobia.” This is another PC lie. We are not talking about something like racism here. Skin color is irrelevant to liberty, but Islam is a threat to liberty. Islam is not a skin color, it is a political system wrapped in the disguise of religion. This serves the same function for Islam as Political Correctness serves in Secular Humanism: it is a shield that is used to shame people into mistakenly thinking they are wrong to oppose it. Back to our example: is it xenophobic to fight an infection? NO! Neither is it xenophobic to oppose a political movement that has openly declared its goal is to force you to submit to it or die. Opposing such a force is rational. It is called self-preservation.
As for the Crusaders: they may have had some improper motivations in leadership, BUT THE CRUSADES WERE DEFENSIVE! They were a response to Islamic invasion. Thus, the attempt to equate the Crusades with Jihad is a false analogy — a violation of logic. So there most certainly IS a difference.
Finally, I agree: there is going to be a nuclear exchange, but I am not so sure there will be much after that. Both Bible and Islamic prophecy foretell this coming battle as the last battle before God steps in and ends things once and for all. In the Bible, it is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. In Islam, it is Allah’s Mahdi. Funny thing is, the Bible tells us of a false prophet (likely Muhammad) who will lead a Satanic kingdom (Islam) to seek world domination. Those who do not submit will lose their heads. The Bible also tells of a beast that will pretend to be Biblical, but will be of Satan and will set-up this Satanic kingdom. This is most likely the apostate Western Churches (Christian and Jewish). Islamic prophecy has never come true — the Bible’s has. For ME (ME, personally), I will side with the Bible.
I still believe in Christmas and Santy Claus…..does that make me unsuited to read this… ;- )).
With respect to the UZA “prophets”……you know you are looking at Communists right ? And I think anti-religious bigots.
Don,
I know that you know what I mean by Truth — as opposed to truth 😉
Cool.
So Santy Claus is real then. Works for me !!! UZA-Commies don’t !
Don,
What the heck are you talking about? Have you turned into Kells with gonads?
I always thought Kells had ample gonads.
The season is Blessed. That’s what I mean. Including much of its trappings.
The Socialism and Pspeak that I read on the UZA-site doesn’t work for me.
Don,
From all my past dealings with UZA, I believe he is a man who seeks Natural Law. I am willing to give him some benefit of the doubt — especially given that he comes from a culture that does not have the history we do where the principles of liberty are concerned. What’s more, I actually envy him (to a point). His country is seeking what ours is trying to give away. Where we should be a light to him and his fellow countrymen, showing them the way, we are a darkness showing them how liberty is not only lost, but sold for the crumbs off another man’s plate.
OK. You’ve had more dealings with him so I trust there is some “purpose” to the rhetoric.
I do however fail to see how one attempts or attains adherence to Natural Law through Socialism.
Don,
He has never shown socialist tendencies in the past, so I am allowing that there may be some misunderstanding on my part as to what he is trying to say, or on his part as to his understanding of Natural Law. That’s all. 🙂
That’s fair WRT your dialogue with him. I an getting my feelings from reading his site.
Well, then you know him better than I, as my only knoweldge of him is in our exchanges here on my site and the RNL. As you know, I simply do not have the time to read many other blog pages. I’d much prefer to be in history when I have free time, like reading one of the many good books you have recommended over the years 🙂
Most times things can be de-constructed by looking at deep structural inconsistencies and/or amoral justifications for actions which so obviously run against Natural Law and Common decency that they could be used as a Poster quote for the rationalization of atrocities.
Thus : “…the true jihadists are lashing out at your governments and unfortunately innocent people are getting in harms way; a good warrior will turn an invasion into his favour; ”
And there we have it.
Without any prejudice here, brother; we are are not here to mince words; we talk straight from the heart;it is very clear that what we call a good warrior here is a man with a moral compass/bible/Koran/or a pen; we use the Bible because we refer to it for common-law and our courts swear by it and 87% of South Africa is Christian; and, if you want to use a weapon then self-defence is a natural right too and that is your prerogative; however, my eternity comes first; we are not here for moral high-ground; we are all in the same boat; and, we are all being played here;
There are virtually no Muslims on these blogs; the jihadists and crusaders (the jihadists call militant Christians crusaders) that are under discussion are the minority, any case; its usually always 10%; on top of that we do not even know how the 90% feel;
Would you call this a fair trial? Therefore, we introduce different perspectives to these very narrow-minded, one-sided expressions to at least make it a fair fight; and in this day and age, it never ceases to amaze us;
Henry Kissinger said: “Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”
As a hunter, you need to outsmart your prey; you need to do the un-expected; a good warrior will turn an invasion into his favour; be blessed
Ah, but as you have said, yourself, a true religion does not command believers to kill innocent people. Islam does exactly this, so it is not a moral code. It is a political code at odds with Natural Law.
As for Muslims, I am followed by several people in Middle Eastern countries. I see them on the administration side of this blog. I can assure you, they are NOT Christians. What’s more, they started following my blogging AFTER I started to speak out against Islam. So I am not so sure you can say there are no Jihadis on the blogs. They are there, they just don’t make their presence known.
And again, I know why the Muslims call Christians ‘Crusaders,’ but the ‘Crusaders’ were defensive. Had Islam left them alone, they would not have attacked Islam. So you can continue to equate the two, but it is a false analogy, which means you are in contradiction to the Natural Law of logic.
Also, Muslims think the entire world belonged to Islam and was taken from them at some undefined point in the past. This is why — to the Muslim mind — their Jihad is defensive. They believe they are the ones taking back what is theirs. The problem is, Islam did not exist before the 7th Century, so how could the world have taken anything from them before they even existed? Islam does not use logic. The same cannot be said about the Judeo/Christian faith, upon whose foundation, science was built. And without that Judeo/Christian faith, what we call science likely still would not exist.
As for a fair trial: I would say I have and continue to present Islam as MUHAMMAD would have it presented. How much more “fair” can I be. But I prefer the term and concept of JUST, not “fair.” Am I just in accusing Islam? YES! Because I am just taking Muhammad at his word. If I take Christ at His Word, I live a life in harmony with Natural Law. If I take Muhammad at his word, I am at war with all humanity until there is only Islam (Muhammad’s actual words — I can post it for you).
Now, when you get to Kissenger, I believe we are on common ground. I think I see where you say we are being played. YES! The Secular Humanists (i,e, Kissenger and the New World Order) are using Islam for their purposes. The Secular Humanist, however, is arrogant to the point of being both blind and stupid. They do not believe in God, so they dismiss ALL religions — even Islam. To them, they think religious people are rubes that can be easily manipulated. So they join forces with Islam, thinking they can use the Muslims to seize power, then deal with Islam later. THEY ARE IDIOTS! It is Islam using them, and as soon as Islam is strong enough, Islam will kill these New World Order idiots.
But where I may (stress may) differ with you is in my belief of how this is going to turn out. I see Biblical prophecy coming true all around us today. If you believe the Bible, we are no longer in the last days, but the End Times. There will be no time after the battle that is about to befall the world. I do not have to fight Islam. The Bible tells me that Christ and His army of Saints is going to do that in person. The Bible also tells me what peoples and nations Christ wipes out with His spoken Word, and they are ALL Islamic! So whatever happens, I know we are about to see things that the Secular Humanists AND Muslims do not believe in, but which will force ALL of them to kneel before the Lord.
I pray that, in this belief, we are brothers. If so, that is all that matters 🙂
The American Colonists fought to divorce themselves from “Common Law” which defines the individual as a “subject” This as per Blackstones’s commentaries etc. Which our Founder’s referenced and knew. Their attempts led them to Iroquois Confederacy, Greek Demoracy, Rome’s Republic, Cicero, the Enlightenment, the Scottish Enlightenment, Englishman Locke and especially the Bible, in the attempt to best protect the individual and his God given Free will recognized by both the adherents of the OT and the NT.
1758 ‘The Law of Nation….. the Constitution retained the Sovereignty of the individual and this didn’t change with our Constitution as once you are sovereign ( free will from God), you are always Sovereign. And if people of the States are sovereign they are always sovereign and not subjects.
Thus this is suspect to me :.. ” it is very clear that what we call a good warrior here is a man with a moral compass/bible/Koran/or a pen; we use the Bible because we refer to it for common-law and our courts swear by it and 87% of South Africa is Christian; and, if you want to use a weapon then self-defence is a natural right too and that is your prerogative; however, my eternity comes first; we are not here for moral high-ground; we are all in the same boat; and, we are all being played here;”
Because you do not Capitalize the Bible here : ” a good warrior here is a man with a moral compass/bible/Koran/or a pen; ” and you DO with the koran….which rhetorically places islam over Christianity. Also you appear to drawing a moral equivalence between islam….Chritianity…and the “man with a pen”.
WE have now….”a man with a pen” as our dictatorial ruler. And I do NOT see any equivalence between islam and Christianity at all. In fact there is much Political Propaganda directed at claiming just such an equivalence in order to justify muslim violence by a reference to a false history. The actual Crusades were a defense and a reaction to over 400 years of unrelenting islamic attacks. And there are NO “crusaders” today. Thus you usage of the term is troubling because it is a term used by muslims today.
UZA,
I knew it was only a matter of time before you caught Don’s attention with your recent posts. Where I have addressed you Spiritually, Don will address you using Secular History, and his pen in this area is MUCH sharper than mine is in matters of faith. I would strongly suggest you think carefully before presuming to contradict him. Experience has shown it seldom ends well for those who attempt to do so 🙂
Believe what you wish; it is your right to; be blessed
If UZA was responding to me.
I have to say this is an intellectually weak response. Especially given the moral aspect and historical context within which I placed my comments.
We have common ground certainly in that our “Elites” are playing a similar game in unison with each other. But assumptions about the Moral imperatives undergirding our respective societies have to be crystal clear in order to determine exactly how “common” our grounds reall are.
be blessed as well.
He was talking to you. Had to be, as it showed on my end as a response to your comment.
Donameche, where your rights end, ours begins; we are a people’s court; our opinions do not count, especially towards other people; we represent Christian, Islam, Atheist, ALL people, equally;
Now, if you were a government official that would be a different story 🙂 we would be having a good ole bun fight;
We choose the humble path; Godspeed; be blessed
UZA,
The problem with your comment is that you cannot serve God — the One True God — if you treat all religions equally. Jesus said this, Himself, but so did Yahweh (and they are the same God). You can tolerate different religions, but not when one of them seeks to kill you. God told the Israelites to kill the pagans in Canaan to the last, and never to intermingle with them. The world suffers today because Israel did not obey. We suffer today for the mistaken notion that all religions are equal, or that you can coexist with people who seek to kill you.
You see, the reason why to things matters much more than you seem to understand. In fact, “why” means everything.
Black3actual, we are public servants; we serve all people, equally;
Do you have a common-law grand jury that you are actively involved in?
Do you speak to 1 000s of people weekly? Face to face?
Do you represent 6 million people?
Do you have an International court case to find remedy for all people?
Well, with an attitude like yours, you won’t have many people interested; judge a tree by it’s fruit, please?
Please read our ecclesiastical case, the 60 page Writ of De Deceptione and the Annexures against the Holy Roman Empire and cronies on our Annexures page where we have laid a charge against HRE for impersonating a faith called Christianity as practised by Jesus the Nazarene and then you tell us our argument for Jesus is weak; be blessed
I think what Joe is saying is that you (one) cannot serve Jesus and mohammed equally.
Your answer to me directly above : ” we are a people’s court; our opinions do not count, especially towards other people; we represent Christian, Islam, Atheist, ALL people, equally;”…. is akin to our ” Equal under thw Law “. I can see that similarity.
One’s rights ending where anothers’ begins ( although you phrased it in the Plural….which is a key difference) is also somewhat recognizable as Natural Rights on our end. It may have been semantics with you phrasing it thus :”..where your rights end, ours begins; ” but at first blush it seems more ‘Collectivist’ in nature than individualist. And we would say “YOUR rights end where mine begin”. Now this may be because of the “common Law” backround you mention which is more collectivist than our tradition….or it may just be a semantic difference in language use….. Make sense. ?
Our system was set up with the primacy of the individuals Natural God given rights….given through Fee will to every soul. Thus a gov’t of man made laws which steps on these rights is wrong….even if the Proposed “reason” for the infraction is said to be “for the good of the Commons”.
WE may be on similar grounds.
Don,
Not if he has based his ideas of Natural Law on a man-made notion of Christ and Christ’s Gospel we’re not.
DonAmeche, the American Republics had a fully functional common-law system before 1779;
South African civil law is Dutch East India Company mercantile law; the Afrikaners during apartheid stamped out the jury system in 1969; yet, our constitutional supremacy is based on English common-law; we are literally starting from scratch, here; even customary law has been corrupted to a point of non existence; so, we have to be all-encompassing; then, as communities and tribes re-establish their own court systems, so then each court will follow it’s own religious teachings; we have to be neutral, that’s all;
Now, that we have reason between us, as a sovereign we are not required to share our personal beliefs, but this occasion calls for it so we will briefly tell you what we believe, but it is not open for discussion to question them; this is where my rights begin and or end 🙂 you know those big words such as “collectivist” which confuse us…
we are a simple people; we do not like using the word “I”, we use “we” as we are soul and flesh responding, together in equal measure of heart and mind ;
1. evil reigns on earth and it will unto the end: we will do our best, while here; but, in II Peter it tells us the earth will be melted and that we must look forward to the New Earth and heavens for therein dwells righteousness;
2. Our battle is of the Spirit/Soul and NOT of the flesh; this earthly battle is merely a mirror of a heavenly battle which has been raging since evil came into this universe; the fallen angels were cast down from this heavenly battle; just like the rothschilds play war games of “good v. evil”, so does the evil that reigns here;
3. we we are a revelations man and believe in the teachings of John the Divine; we lived in the wilderness for years too, but we were called to stand for truth even though Babylon, its internet and AI devices are repugnant to our very soul; we abhor it, but as sovereigns we are duty-bounded to serve because it’s in the duty of serving others where our freedom lies; we are not on social media, but we do have a group called “common law in south Africa”; please do join them and tell them bt is a jihadist and they will surely laugh:)
we were raised in a charismatic church where the leaders washed the people’s feet to humble themselves, where the leaders prayed in sackcloth and ashes for the redemption of mankind, where they danced in the Holy Spirit and spoke in tongues, where demons were shaken and danced and rolled out of you in the name of Jesus Christ, the Nazarene, where healing was done by the laying on of hands, and where the leaders lived on alms: on the 10% of the earnings of the congregation who were mostly the meek, the middle-class and poor;
we rebelled against those teachings until 5 years ago when we came to our senses and were reminded that in order to serve others we had to humble ourselves because we were arrogant beyond measure; we were baptised in the wilderness by a dear brother in the name of the ONE GREAT MYSTERY OF ALL THAT IS; without any intermediaries because of ALL the deceptions; Jesus will understand; we explained it to him; as long as it is for the redemption of our soul, the flesh must perish if it must; and we have had no less than 8 near-death experiences; we were buried alive in the Angola war for 3 days; we know what the fear of dying feels like, but at some point there is a final surrender to the fight and with it comes a sweet release of pure acceptance of everything being perfect as it is; and, that Creation is fully in control because evil cannot create, it can only destroy; as it will destroy the body once it no longer is inhabited and protected by the soul;
ALL the teachings have been corrupted my friends: the Bible, Quran, Torah and ALL others; they are not worth the paper they are written on; sir Francis Drake (Dragon + reptilian) wrote secret spells into the Bible; into 64 of Jesus’ parables alone; and, we want to argue about who is right or wrong?
Even the name of GOD: The Great Mystery as we call it, has been corrupted with the names of ancient gods; Elohim = YHWH = Allah; all these factions all claim to come from the Sumerian Kings and their Alien/ET gods and they defiled mankind with their Nephilim blood and the earth is under quarantine where no man or nephilim-blood can ever leave earth; the dark ones have spent 500 years in trying to unlock the stargates because they cannot get out using conventional spacecraft; we are locked into a prison-planet-earth-ship WITH THE INMATES; most cultures and especially covenantal cultures have been tainted with the reptilian blood as we have too;
We pray every day that the ONE WHO CREATED ALL will finally be merciful and destroy all this evil because it’s the only way our souls will be freed from this evil matrix; its a soul trap and Jesus taught us how to liberate our souls, not the flesh; and when the final trumpet blows and the final battle has finished and Judgement is called we will stand accountable and we refuse to go with the “Good” or the “Evil” because John warned us of the deception of BOTH; instead we wil demand our soul go back to the place it was created, wherever that may be, but it is NOT HERE;
This is why we do not wish to argue religion, sport, politics or dictating of family values; it’s all been corrupted, every last ounce of the material world, our minds and everything we think; only our souls remain pure; when the Great Book is opened there will be NO man found in the earth, on the earth or above it who is worthy to open the Book;
We also abhor the word “leader” as it could be construed as HIERARCHY as opposed to NOARCHY, meaning none: all are equal; nonetheless, we see humanity looking for guidance and “leadership” in these troubled times; the people of SA need guidance and all humanity also needs guidance; believe it or not: both you Black3actual and DonAmeche are leaders; your people are already looking up to you whether you like it or not; so, bear that in mind when you speak in public at all times; when we stand in front of Christians we speak their language and when we stand in front of Moslems we respect their teachings and so forth; the Messiah is prophesised to speak ALL teachings; we are all in the same boat: THE REAL GAME IS:
ALL SOULS VS EVIL EARTH
Hope this helps; however, our belief is not open for discussion; you are free to discuss common-law or other issues WITH THE AIM OF SEEKING REMEDY: TRUE JUSTICE IS SEEKING RECONCILIATION AND NOT RETRIBUTION – Albie Sachs, father of our South African Bill of Rights;
In peace, be blessed, brother-thomas
“the Bible, Quran, Torah and ALL others; they are not worth the paper they are written on”
“Elohim = YHWH = Allah”
OK, UZA, I apologize: we are NOT brothers. In fact, you are antichrist. You can claim the name of Christ all you want, but I fear it will do you no good. I pray I am wrong.
I do not understand how you can dismiss the Bible and claim that Yahweh is Allah, then claim the name of Jesus as your Savior. If not for the Bible, you have nothing. You do not even have Jesus. The promise of Messiah comes from God’s Word — the Bible. It is by God’s promise that we even know that Christ is the Messiah. If God’s Word can be corrupted, then he is not God, and Christ is not the Messiah. But we have God’s Word faithfully preserved in many different scripts written long before you claim the Bible was perverted. These ancient manuscripts affirm the Scripture of today has been faithfully preserved, which means you believe in A — a different, false Bible or B — a lie of your own making. Either way, you have built your religion on sifting sands.
I do not judge your salvation. I feel you have a sincere desire to seek God. And ROmans 1-2 tells me you may well find Him. But I can say with 100% absolute certainty that you have a flawed understanding of the Bible and Christ. It is not me who says this, but God — through His prophets and Scribes. They testify against you: I just bear witness for them.
I do not need to read your paper to tell you your argument is weak; I can read your misunderstanding of Christ’s Gospel here and know that what follows must be weak. You say you are trying to find solutions for all people. CHRIST DID NOT TEACH THIS!
Luke 12:49
Christ Divides Men
49 “I [a]have come to cast fire upon the earth; and [b]how I wish it were already kindled!
Matthew 10:35
35 For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law;
Christ said there is ONE way — 1; and that is Him. Jesus is the only way to the Father:
John 14:6
6 Jesus *said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.
You have said you seek to find harmony between all religions. This means you are looking to put pagans and antichrist equal to God. That is NOT Christ’s Gospel.
You have said you separate the God in the Old Testament from Christ. Jesus said they are ONE! So that is not Christ’s Gospel.
Jesus did not tell his people to serve all people equally. He tells us to care for all people, and to have an agape love for them, but His brothers and sisters are those who obey Him — not the pagans you are equating with the Saints.
So you have made up your own Jesus and your own Gospel, and Paul has already addressed people who do this:
Galatians 1:6-9
6 I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you [a]by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; 7 which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel [b]contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be [c]accursed! 9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel [d]contrary to what you received, he is to be [e]accursed!
ONE MORE THING:
You are also in violation of Natural Law for the same reason. Jesus said He is the Way. Psalm 119 defines ‘The Way” as God’s righteousness. In Romans 1-2, Paul tells us that Natural Law is God’s Righteousness. They are the same, and they are part of Who Christ is: the Law incarnate. So, by creating your own Jesus and your own Gospel, you are changing the Law — God’ Law. That means you are claiming to be God. That makes you “the man of lawlessness”
UZA, I am no longer sure you understand Natural Law at all. I think you have morphed it into a conception of man’s law, as in the likes of Thomas Hobbes. I caution you, that will only lead to more bloodshed.