LESSONS IN LOGIC: Bathroom Gender Debate Yields Unintended Admission



It’s just logically correct

When properly applied, logical extension is a powerful tool.  For example, if we apply it to the bathroom/gender issue currently in the news, we find that our sexual orientation is not an accident of birth after all, but a choice — just as many have claimed.  But how do we arrive at this conclusion?

The easiest way is to just notice that the people who support the GLBT agenda have now added a ‘Q’ — for ‘Questioning.  If you Google it, you’ll find it.  Here is just one example:

Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Trans, or Questioning

Now, simple logic says that, if you are born hetero or homosexual, then you are not going to ‘question:’ you will know.  Even the assertion that you can question implies choice, which implies that it is not pre-determined.  But there’s more.

If you will do another Google search, you will find that the people pushing this gender/bathroom agenda say that we must allow people to use the bathroom that matches how the ‘identify’ at that time.  Well, there is yet another choice only, this time, it is not even connected to your sexual organs or orientation, but your whim.  This is a direct admission that one can ‘chose’ their gender and, because the people pushing this non-sense have equated gender with sex (which it is not, but that is an entirely different post), then the logical conclusion is:

One is not born gay, one choose to be!

And this means (again, by logical extension) that the LGBTQ agenda has nothing to do with ‘fairness’ or ‘equality’ and everything to do with political power of a minority over the majority — period!  (in this case, the forced normalcy of deviancy along with the creation of special — not equal — rights and protected classes).

Now, before you decide to pull out your politically correct stakes and start kindling a fire for me, let me try one more thing to make my case.

What if I declare that I identify as a ‘conservative male lesbian’ and demand that I then be afforded the same protections as any other lesbian?  Do you think the LGBTQ community is going to accept me — a male lesbian living as a heterosexual male?

HONESTY TEST:  If you are honest with yourself, you know the answer to that last question.  And with that answer, I rest my case.

Ain’t logic a bugger?  OK, let the hate begin 🙂

[NOTE: I no longer think of my voice as anything special.  There was a time when I believed I had something important to say, but not so much these days.  I write now because I feel driven to do so.  Something inside me will not let me rest until I post the pages you just read.  I’d just as soon not bother anymore.  It all seems like no one is listening and I do more harm than good.  So I have come to trust that whatever it is driving me has all this under control.  Personally, I believe it is God, but others may not.  All I ask is that, if anything I write helps you, or you think it might help others in any way, please, share this page.  Re-blog it, share it on FB or send the link to your friends.  So long as you feel it will do more good than harm, then please, use this page however you wish.  Thank you.]


3 thoughts on “LESSONS IN LOGIC: Bathroom Gender Debate Yields Unintended Admission

  1. That was great! “…a male lesbian living as a heterosexual male?” Plus…a conservative one at that! LOL!!

    It certainly takes the truth (plus wisdom and logic) to confound “those who are wise in their own eyes!”

    Just found out via email that the “transgender” bathroom bill stalled out here in CA. However this is just a temporary victory. They never give up…so the lunatic dems will continue to try and push this stupid bill.

    I think that the victories in other states (not fruitcake CA) have demonstrated that this push for LGBTQ…xyz bathroom bills is taking the tolerance agenda way to far! People are waking up to the fact that they have been duped by the “tolerance” gestapo and that these sick-in-the-head “activists” will NEVER stop pushing their aberrant behavior issues further and further into sinful craziness.

  2. “A male lesbian living as a Conservative heterosexual male”.

    You’re on to me ! How the fk did you know ?
    For the gals the Hetero-male part is obvious……the usual “stuff”. The “male-lesbian” part displays itself as me looking admiringly and jealously at her lovely silk dress on the floor …… but still not bothering to pick it up and put it in the Wash. ( I’d have to be a Transgendered female-lesbian living as a hetero-make for THAT to happen ). See there ARE absolutes after all !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s