PC Water Torture: The Racial Narrative

The Media Denies Racial Aspect To Lane Shooting While Still Promoting Lies About Zimmerman Case

NOTE:  All posts in the “PC Water Torture” series are meant to illustrate the arguments presented in the secondary topic series.  The “PC Water Torture” posts are meant to provide a constant drip of posts about related stories that – when taken individually – may not appear to indicate an agenda, but when taken collectively, over time, form a clear picture of an agenda.  It is hoped that, over time, the constant ‘dripping’ of these stories will make the point – much the same way the constant dripping in the proverbial Chinese water torture is intended to break the victims will to resist.  In this case, this post illustrates the argument presented in the series on Racism and the Racial Media Narrative. 

Even after the Zimmerman acquittal, after a trial that provided absolutely no evidence of a racial motivation for the shooting of Martin, the media is still reporting that the incident was racially motivated.  This conclusion is supported by the fact that the FBI reported it could find no evidence of Zimmerman holding racial prejudices toward blacks.  What’s more, in spite of the fact that Zimmerman is and identifies himself as Hispanic, the media is still referring to him as white.  All of this is now a matter of public record and, so far as logic and the law are concerned, constitute fact – as best it could be determined.  Therefore, at this point, the media is not making a ‘mistake’ when it reports that Martin was shot by a white racist, it is pushing a lie.  And since the government has tied itself to this false narrative from Obama to U.S. Congressional Representatives and supposed Civil Rights leaders, this makes the lie propaganda – and that’s by definition.

FBI: No evidence Zimmerman was racist

Records could be problem for Justice Dept.’s race case

Family of Emmett Till Discusses Zimmerman Verdict: ‘Hard to Say That We’ve Moved Anywhere From 50 Years Ago’

“Number one, Trayvon was killed by a white boy that got out of his truck armed to the teeth, chased him down then killed him, and then the jury did the same thing they did in 1955 with Emmett Till, they came back with a not guilty vote,”

MLK III: Trayvon Martin Killing Shows That Skin Color ‘Remains a License to Profile, to Arrest and to Even Murder’

“However, sadly, the tears of Trayvon Martin’s mother and father remind us that, far too frequently, the color of one’s skin remains a license to profile, to arrest and to even murder with no regard for the content of one’s character,” he said, calling for the repeal of “stand your ground” self-defense laws, CBS News reports.

Sadly, there is some truth to what MLK III said about skin color granting a license to kill, but it’s the opposite of what he is claiming: racially motivated killings of whites by blacks are being ignored while cases of about racially motivated whites killing blacks are being concocted from thin air (i.e. the Zimmerman narrative).  The latest example of the media pushing a fake narrative designed to deflect attention from black-on-white crime is the Christ Lane shooting.  Start by reading the tweets in this story:

‘HATE THEM’: Here’s What Teen Accused of Murdering Australian Student Had to Say About ‘White’ People, Guns and Killing on Twitter

Now, consider the narrative that is now being pushed by the media and their agents in the ‘Civil Rights’ movement:

MSNBC’s Reid: Why is Chris Lane Shooting Being Made ‘Racial’?

Jesse Jackson: Wrong to Compare Trayvon Martin Case to ‘Foolish Rampage Killing’ of Chris Lane

Al Sharpton on Chris Lane Killing: ‘Nothing to Protest’ Because It Wasn’t ‘Racial’ and ‘System Worked’

So long as it remains in the media and with private organizations such as Sharpton’s and Jackson’s, this is not enough to determine that we are dealing with real propaganda or racism.  All we have here is bigotry – organized bigotry, but it’s still just bigotry.  However, when the government takes sides in and moves to protect this narrative – especially in the face of clear evidence that racial hatred is an aspect of this crime – then we have crossed the line into racism (remember, racism has to be tied to government and/or social policy) and the narrative becomes propaganda.  And, in the case of the Lane shooting, this is exactly what we have: the government blatantly lying to protect and push its racial narrative:

‘It Has Nothing to Do with Chris Being White’: DA Says Race Not a Factor in Aussie’s Oklahoma Slaying

The tweets from the first story make this DA’s claims a lie – by definition.  And that means the government is obstructing justice as part of policy.  This policy further supports the trend we have seen since Obama took office.  And that is real racism on the part of the Obama Administration, and this narrative that the problem is white-on-black and not black-on-white constitutes real propaganda.  Keep looking for it, you’ll find more evidence of this trend…because it’s real.  This is why you aren’t hearing about all the other cases of blacks killing whites “for Trayvon.”