You read that title correctly. If Obama can force neighborhoods to accept people they would rather not live with, then there is not right to gay marriage. The freedom of association is a Constitutionally protected right. It falls under the 9th and 10th Amendments. This is also where you find the right to contract. Both rights form the foundation for any claim homosexuals may make to a right to marriage. By claiming he has the authority to force communities to accept people with whom they would rather not associate, Obama is claiming the freedom of association and right to contract are NOT Constitutional rights. Therefore, there can be no right to marriage and it can be outlawed by popular vote of the people.
At the same time, however, when a man claims authority to force and deny the same rights according to his personal whim, he is claiming to be a dictator. Therefore, if Obama is going to argue that he can force integrate communities while asserting that gay marriage is still a right, then Obama is claiming the law means whatever he says it means. That is the very definition of a dictator.
So which is it, people? Are we going to get hold of ourselves and return to sanity, or are we going to allow this madman to lead us down the same road that Germany, Italy, Russia, China and Cuba have traveled?
One thought on “LESSONS IN LOGIC: Obama’s Decree to Integrate Neighborhoods Admits Gay Marriage NOT a Right — or that He IS Our Dictator”
Reblogged this on The Rio Norte Line.