AGENDAS: The “New World Order”

Tracing The Evidence Of Purposeful Engineering Of Global Governance

This post is connected to “Spirits and Types” because it shows the ‘spirit’ of collectivism has been prominent since the very beginning of human history.  It is also a subset of our series on “Social Engineering.”  It is the stuff of ‘conspiracy theory,’ and as such, it is often dismissed.  This is by design.  Those who are working toward the ultimate goal of a single, all-powerful global government do so from the shadows, and it serves their purposes to paint anyone who tries to shine the light of day on them and their activities as ‘conspiracy theorists’ and ‘kooks.’  But the evidence proving that they are working toward this goal and for how they plan to do it is everywhere – if we only look.  As with all spirits of darkness, these people cannot resist the urge to boast, so they have openly advertised their goals and even their tactics.  This post is meant to reveal just a bit of what can be found when we take time to look.

First of all, we must understand that the spirit of collectivism has been around since the time of Nimrod and Babylon.  This is our first accounting of man trying to order humanity, and of men trying to take the place of God by exalting himself above God.  This is what the drive for collectivism is all about: man’s attempt to replace God with himself and then re-order God’s creation in line with the desire(s) of the man or men in charge of humanity. The effort is in vain; it will never succeed.  Even in Scripture, where it tells of global governance near the end times, it also tells us that not all nations will fall under the collective control.  There will be a few who remain independent.  This is because God’s Natural Law cannot be fully subverted by his creation (man), and – no matter how much progress we may believe we have made toward changing His law – eventually, it will reassert itself.

So, how long has the modern quest for the “New World Order” been with us?  Well, we have these words from George Washington:

“It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am.”

(1798 Acknowledged that Illuminati activity had come to the USA)

And this from Andrew Jackson:

“We must establish a new world order based on justice, on equity, and on peace.”

The point here is not the intention behind the words so much as the mere fact that Washington acknowledged the spirit of collectivism and drive for a ‘New World Order’ was in this nation, and that Jackson was using the term ‘New World Order’ much earlier in our history than many may have been aware.  Now, let’s look at a few more quotes, in chronological order:

“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England [Fabians]… (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.”

—Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book “Tragedy and Hope”

We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”  

– Arthur Schlesinger Jr., ‘The CFR Journal Foreign Affairs’, August 1975

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

“In October 1917, we parted with the old world, rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road!? He further reassures his Communist colleagues: Comrades, do not be concerned about all that you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.”

Mikhail Gorbachev, Nov. 2, 1987 addressed the Soviet Politburo

“By the end of this decade we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations… a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of survival. One world government is inevitable.”

Karl Wojtyl, a.k.a A Pope John Paul II, 1990

“Out of these troubled times, our objective—a new world order—can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known.”

–George Herbert Walker Bush, September 11, 1990

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

 “This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long — We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”

David Rockefeller, (banker) Sept. 23, 1994

“The decade of the nineteen nineties was meant to have been one in which a new international order [see this post], free of the by polar rivalry of earlier days, was to have been established”

Jonathan Winston Howard, March 13, 2003 in an National Address to the Australia

“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea—a new world order…to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law… The illumination of a thousand points of light… The winds of change are with us now.”

–George Herbert Walker Bush, January 3, 2012

This can go on and on, but I will stop with these type of quotes and move to those of a different but connected nature.  First, let me draw your attention to how often the theme of using a crisis to bring about the goal is repeated in the quotes above (and, if you follow me on line, many of my other previous posts).  Then, recall how many times this nation’s leaders have shown a willingness – almost eagerness – to enter into armed conflicts where we have little if any national interests.  Now, keeping these things in mind, consider these words:

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.”

–George Herbert Walker Bush

“A world government can intervene militarily in the internal affairs of any nation when it disapproves of their activities.”  

– Kofi Annan, U.N. Secretary General

I could cite more like these, but these two are enough.  They demonstrate that the idea is to create a global government and the path is through crisis.  If the crisis is big enough and the people suffer enough, they will beg for this ‘New World Order.’  This saves them from having to force it on us and – at least in the mind of those who are working toward this goal – it will be ‘bloodless:’

“We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”  

— Arthur Schlesinger Jr., ‘The CFR Journal Foreign Affairs’, August 1975.

Now, consider a few more questions:

1 – How can this many people, from this many different nations and cultures, across this many years, work this consistently toward the same goal?  It flies in the face of human nature – unless there is an over-all governing force behind this process; a force that has survived across the entire timeline.  In this case, the continuity we see not only makes sense, it is to be expected.  And once we expect something, we should be able to find more indications of it in actual observation of our world.

2 – How does one create a ‘crisis’ large enough, scary enough or painful enough to convince the entire world to surrender to tyranny?  Does one do this through global war?  Or does one do it through global economic collapse?  Or is it done through a global famine and food shortage?  Or do you do it through the threat of global catastrophe, such as global warming or climate change?  Or does one do it through fear, such as global terrorism?  And can any of these things be manufactured?  And, if so, does it mean there is no central control, or is it just that different groups are trying different approaches toward the same ultimate goal?

3 – Finally, is it a ‘conspiracy’ when it is defined, explained, justified and advocated this openly, and this unashamedly?

“The case for government by elites is irrefutable.”

— Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?


7 thoughts on “AGENDAS: The “New World Order”

    1. Dr. Rex;

      I think it is mufti-faceted. Yes, to a great extent, I think it is the haves trying to hold on to and build on what they have. But I think there are additional motivations, as well. There are also egotists who seek power for the sake of power, and there are others who honestly believe they are doing “good” to humanity — saving them in spite of themselves. Still, given all these competing motivations, it is interesting to me that they somehow all come together to work — in different ways (i.e. ‘types’) for the same goal (i.e. ‘spirit’)

  1. Joe ,
    not enough light has been shed on these, and won’t be, as the media is complicit in the suppression of information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s